Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Pricing Strategies in an Inflationary Market

Note: This was written last March, while I was working for the East Central Indiana SBDC...even though some supply costs have leveled a bit, I think this information is still relevant.


As supply costs in the food and beverage industry are inflating at alarming rates, now is a good time for effective food service managers to revisit their menus and develop some pricing strategies to position them for continued success in the marketplace. Quite a few operators are rightfully concerned about recent price increases. Still, this actually provides a nice window of opportunity to make some changes to menu prices and actually increase profit.

While I would like to provide a tried and proven formula food service managers could use for pricing their menus, the fact is that menu pricing is more of an art than a science. There are just too many different factors that come in to play and probably one of the biggest mistakes managers make is to price their menu offerings based on formula rather than thinking about some of these factors.Any business that is considering their menu prices should not only consider their supplier costs, but also a competitive analysis and some form of consumer price sensitivity research.

Having spent over 18 years as a manager in the food and beverage industry, I have heard so many of my colleagues make this erroneous statement – “You have to maintain a food cost of 33% or less or you can’t make it in this business.” Many food service managers take this to heart so much that they figure out their ingredient costs for an item and then multiply times 3 to get their menu price. This is a foolish pricing strategy, as there is significantly more involved in developing a successful menu.

The first thing to remember in pricing strategy is that it there is a difference between food cost/gross margins and gross profit. Gross margin is the percentage of the difference between your selling price and your supplier cost divided by the selling price (food cost is simply 100% – gross margin %)


Gross Margin = (Selling Price – Supplier Cost)/Selling Price


Gross profit is the dollar amount difference between the selling price and the supplier cost.


Gross Profit = Selling Price – Supplier Cost


The most important thing to remember is that gross profit is what pays the bills, not gross margin!


Below is an example of two restaurant managers with a company that owns a small chain of fine dining establishments. In this scenario, their supplier raised the cost of a bottle of their most popular wine from $6.00/bottle to $9.00/bottle. Each manager has a different strategy for dealing with the price increase.


Original Pricing

Restaurant 1

Restaurant 2

Supplier Cost

$6.00

$9.00

$9.00

Menu Price

$20.00

$30.00

$24.00

Food Cost %

30%

30%

37.5%

Gross Margin %

70%

70%

63.5%

Gross Profit

$14.00

$21.00

$15.00


In Restaurant 1, the manager believes in maintaining his margin, so he raises his price to $30.00 per bottle. All is good in his world, as he is now making $7.00 more per bottle of wine than he was before and he is still maintaining his 30% food cost.

Restaurant 2 features a savvier manager. She knows her customers and is afraid that with such a steep increase, more of her customers will skip the wine to keep their dinner bills down. She still raises her prices to increase her gross profit, but her increase is not nearly as much as her counterpart at Restaurant 1 and she is losing a bit of her margin.

Chances are that Restaurant 1 will lose some sales because their price increase is so steep. Restaurant 2 is more likely to maintain the same volume of units sold. They compare notes at the end of the following month and find the following results:


Restaurant 1 Last Month

Restaurant 1 This Month

Restaurant 2 Last Month

Restaurant 2 This Month

Wine Bottles Sold

100

50

100

100

Food Cost %

30%

30%

30%

37.5%

Gross Margin %

70%

70%

70%

63.5%

Gross Profit

$1,400.00

$1,050.00

$1,400.00

$1,500.00


By keeping her price increase at a lower level, Restaurant 2 did not lose any units sold and made $100 more dollars than the previous month even though her gross margin decreased. Restaurant 2 made $350 less than the previous month, even though he maintained his margin.

This is obviously an oversimplification of what can happen in these difficult times, but as prices go up from suppliers, menu prices will have to go up, as well. If not, an establishment will have to get a lot more customers to make the same amount of money that was being earned prior to the supplier increases. At the same time, an overreaction and too much of a price increase may make it easier to lose customer loyalty to competitors who are not as aggressive with their price increases.

In developing a strategy to deal with higher supplier costs, food service managers should remember to focus more on profit than on margin. For many establishments that have a loyal customer base, it is fairly easy to site articles that are showing 200% - 300% increases in supplier costs and then tell customers that a price increase was necessary, but that the increases were kept to a bare minimum.

With a bit of attention to consumer spending habits, the competition and supplier costs, smart operators have the opportunity to turn the proverbial lemons into lemonade.

2 comments:

jessy said...

Although your blog focus is on small business economics--and I find your mixture of common sense and economic theory helpful--I'd love to hear your thoughts on buying stock in the current economic environment. It seems like your small business savvy would certainly translate to advice for the private investor. And certainly, any person can benefit--small business or otherwise--with an excellent portfolio.

My urge is to buy when everything is low, and just hold tight for ten years. However, I'm new to the game and worry about the long term viability of such falling giants as GM.

Any advice?

Rick said...

I personally do not invest in the stock market (except the portion of my mutual fund that is dedicated to a company managed stock portfolio). The reason is because I am uncomfortable with the dual value of stocks. The initial premise of the stock market was to allow companies that have developed a profitable business concept to grow to larger proportions. It should be a win/win scenario where investors who haven't come up with their own ideas can invest in those companies who have proven formula for success and want to grow. The problem is that stock prices get tied to "market" factors outside the actual performance of the company.

For example, there was an earning report on Home Depot stating that their profit went down 24% compared to last year. Negative news, so their stock price lost value. Home Depot today is trading at about $30/share. Last year at this time it was at $40/share. So if you had Home Depot in your portfolio and held on to it, you lost 25% of your value. But let's look at Home Depot's performance last year. They did $77,349M in sales and made $7,242M in operating profit. That's a 9.3% net profit margin. Pretty good from my stand point. There were about 1,849M average shares of Home Depot last year, which results is a $3.92 earnings per share (this is based on operating profit, not net profit). So from operations, if you bought a share for $40, you would have made a 9.8% return on investment. If you got in at $30, it would be a 13% return on investment. Both are pretty good numbers...better than you would do putting that money in your money market account. So why the decrease in stock value? Well earnings are decreasing, people are worried about the housing market (let's not forget the "home" in the name) and investors make their evaluations on stock based on those factors, not just the return on investment potential. So people start selling off Home Depot stock so they can invest in something that will give them a better return. Home Depot no longer has cash from investors, so they have to borrow money to grow (don't forget the old saying, "grow or die", hence, the lower net profit to pay for interest to borrow that money. This brings the earning down to $4,395M or about $2.37/share.

My opinion is that if you hold on to this for 10 years, so many things can happen to increase of decrease the value of your investment that are not directly related to Home Depot's actual performance. You are counting on their executives to make wise business decisions with the capital available. You may find out that they made an accounting error and really didn't earn what they stated and the following year they have to "write off" other losses. Even being profitable, if the Dow index plunges, people might sell off Home Depot shares, thereby decreasing the stock value. To me, it's just hard to speculate.

GM five years ago was at about $26/share, now it is hovering around $10. Here are my four darling companies that I have been tracking and would have invested in if I was willing to play the game...BP, Southwest Airlines, Johnson&Johnson and Church & Dwight (they make Arm & Hammer Baking soda...located in Princeton NJ). J&J went from $51 - $71. BP from $15 to $69. Southwest from $16.5 to $15. Church & Dwight from $22 to $61. I would have done pretty well, except for the Southwest. But I am still holding out for Southwest to improve. Why these choices, not because I believe the stocks will gain value, but I believe in their products/services and company philosophies. Part of me thinks it is pure luck looking at these performances, but another part of me thinks it has to do with me caring about what the company's business model rather than wondering whether I would make money. I like Southwest's flair and how they approach air travel better than all their competitors. I got to know some BP executives when I was working in Alaska and I just liked their company philosophy (they truly are investing in alternative energies). I like the fact that baking soda has so many applications and I still think J&J is on the cutting edge of developing great home health care products (plus I still haven't found a generic band-aid that matches the comfort of a J&J brand!). But aside from performance to date, my opinion remains that these values are still at the whim of the market and could plummet at anytime.

After this long winded explanation, my conclusion is, don't listen to me for investment advice! I don't want that responsibility. May I suggest reading some of Warren Buffet’s books? Or investing in a small business that has a good plan and gives you the opportunity to take part in the decision making process.